November 14, 2023

I heard an interview recently with Zen practitioner and teacher Henry Shukman. At one point in the interview he described koans as paradoxical questions that call out to our souls on some fundamental level. Our mind wants to understand them, but can’t; part of the point of a koan is to break through the mind’s desire to understand and get to a more fundamental understanding. Shukman put forth a couple koans for the listener to ponder, and I understood what he meant: on some level I intuitively wanted to chew on the question, to sit with it and try to connect with what it wanted to teach me.

This interview contributed to my hypothesis that I would eventually need to find a buddhist monk to help me hone my spiritual practice. I outlined before that I instead found a minister, a church, and a group that are guiding my practice in a more Christian vain. I left out an interesting detail in that decision: upon returning to church and in the process reading scriptures again, I found the Gospels in general and Jesus’ teaching in particular to be koan-like. Jesus’ teachings tend to be paradoxical. We’ve often tried to make logical sense out of these teachings, but I’m starting to understand that Jesus’ teachings are meant to be experienced, to be felt, and to be known in a way the mind can’t fully comprehend. Just read the Sermon on the Mount and see if you can make it make sense. I still cannot.

More broadly, I’ve been struck by how often I now read scripture and think some version of “I think I know what he’s trying to convey, I’ve experienced a version of that before”. To be very clear, there’s still plenty of scripture that bewilders me, and plenty (particularly in the Old Testament) that I find dated or even misleading. But scripture now calls out to me in a way it didn’t before.

Today I want to dig into a couple passages that I’ve found interesting recently. The first is the story of Adam and Eve in Genesis 2 and 3. Generally the way I learned this story was that the serpent represented the devil, that under the serpent’s influence man chose sin over God, and that man has been irredeemably sinful, but by the grace of God, ever since. Read through this lens, the story of Adam and Eve feels a bit like mythology to me. And perhaps it is. But I actually think the story gets at a deeper truth. To me, Adam and Eve choosing to eat from the tree of knowledge represents the elevation of the human mind and ego to be on equal footing with God and nature. On some level we recognize that humans are unique among species in that whereas other species tend to live more in harmony with nature and the world around them, humans appear to be unique in our desire to modify, manipulate, and control our environment. Somewhere along our evolutionary path, we developed the capacity for rational thought; then we convinced ourselves that our capacity for rational thought put us in control of ourselves and our destinies (or to use religious lingo, we convinced ourselves that our capacity for rational thought put us on equal footing with God). We made gods out of our egos. Whereas less intelligent creatures are more often bound by their instincts or emotions, humans layer in a capacity for rational thought which we increasingly use to override our intuition and emotion. Indeed, at this point we humans appear to have a deeply held belief that our rational minds are superior to our emotional, intuitive, and spiritual selves. To me, the story of Adam and Eve is the story of humanity elevating our rational minds and egos and suppressing our emotional and spiritual selves, putting ourselves out of balance (and in spiritual/biblical terms, putting unnecessary separation between us and God); effectively, humanity has been striving and struggling to get back to wholeness ever since.

The second interesting story is that of Cain and Abel. Of particular interest is the section of Genesis 4:3-8. Cain and Abel both bring offerings to God, but God only looks upon Abel’s offering with favor. Cain becomes angry and God effectively points out to Cain that his own shortcomings (in this case, his own stinginess toward God) serve as the true source of his anger. Unwilling to face the truth, Cain kills his brother instead.

This story blows me away. Each of us harbor our shortcomings. As far as I can tell, we loath being confronted with our shortcomings. We will do practically anything to avoid admitting and addressing our shortcomings. I’ve long thought that we dislike most in others those characteristics we dislike most in ourselves. I’m now coming to appreciate that we dislike seeing our shortcomings in others precisely because we want to avoid noticing these shortcomings in ourselves. And so we criticize, we belittle, we shun. If those attempts don’t work, we escalate to punishment and eventually potentially even violence. It’s breathtaking to ponder how much of the world’s violence is caused or at least abetted by someone’s attempt to avoid confronting their own shortcomings. Which brings us back to Cain; Cain so didn’t want to confront his own stinginess with God that he killed his own brother in an attempt to avoid admitting the truth to himself. The point of the story is not to warn us not to be like Cain; the point of the story is to warn us that we are all like Cain. And of course the solution is simple: with God’s help, we acknowledge, accept, and love our shortcomings as part of who we are, and then live as an expression of that love. But the solution requires our ego to surrender its illusion of control, which brings us back to Adam and Eve.

Let’s move to the New Testament, where Matthew 14 tells the story of Jesus walking on water. Jesus had sent the disciples ahead of him in a boat that was getting getting rocked by a storm. Jesus appeared to them walking on water. Peter, with Jesus’ invitation, gets out of the boat to walk toward Jesus, until he gets distracted by the wind and begins to sink.

One of the tools Christian spiritualists use is to put oneself in the passage, typically as one of the participants. Personally, I found the idea of getting out of a boat during a storm too hard to comprehend. What occurred to me is that 1) we all have storms in our lives, as represented by those areas of frustration or emotional turmoil; 2) we also all have boats, meaning those things to which we cling in the mistaken belief that they keep us safe; and 3) we all have those miracles, like walking on water, that seem impossible but are in fact very much available to us if we pursue them in harmony with God.

I’ll be the first to admit that until very recently I assumed the Bible had little to teach me. I’m now somewhat overwhelmed at the wisdom contained within. Not all passages are interesting. In particular, I don’t find resonance in God’s punishments in the Old Testament, these again read like mythology to me, and don’t resonate with God as I experience God. From what I can tell, God’s paradox is that God wants to enter our lives and flow through us, but that God only enters where God is invited. Thus, our punishments are not meted out by God, but rather as the natural consequences of our own (or others) actions, or admittedly sometimes occur by random chance. But God is there to soothe and heal us, even in the face of unfair or unjust punishment, if only we allow for God’s presence.

I love you both,

Dad

Honoring a thought

November 9, 2023

Hi Leland and Everett,

In my ongoing struggle with and (hopefully) transformation away from living as a codependent, I had a small but (I think) important breakthrough recently.

As mentioned previously, I came to appreciate over the summer that I no longer want to live a life attempting to control others. I also no longer want to live a life under the control of others. This led to a summer of confusion and emotional chaos, as I didn’t know how to engage with others outside the parameters of a codependent dance of attempting to control and being controlled.

As I started learning (and to be clear, I am very much still learning) to find peace in not wanting to control others, I periodically encountered burning emotions around what I perceived to be bothersome behavior by others. At first this emotion didn’t surprise me: I assumed I was just being tempted by my now suddenly suppressed desire to control others. With continued introspection and exploration, I discovered something different.

Ultimately what I discovered was that the burning emotion signified some idea or thought that wanted to be expressed. This surprised me, as the thought often seemed a lot like advice or, frankly, an effort to control. But I finally realized that I can honor a thought without attaching to an outcome. My habit was to translate a thought into advice or a desired outcome, and then I would go ‘explain’ something to someone in an attempt to achieve the desired outcome. Attaching to the outcome, particularly when conversations didn’t go as hoped, resulted in frustration and the fundamental cracks in all my relationships. And my logical assumption was that by dropping my need to control others I would stop giving advice or saying the things that came to me. What I discovered instead was a call to express thoughts as cleanly and authentically as possible, without the extra baggage of my interpretation; and then, from there, my role is to let go of the outcome. Accept that sometimes the thought will be received well. Sometimes the thought will be received poorly. Sometimes the audience isn’t ready to hear the thought, but will be someday (and so it’s important to plant the thought now, so that they might hear it when they are ready).

I was quite surprised to discover that living authentically can mean honoring certain thoughts that come to us (those that come with a certain emotional weight or resonance) while simultaneously accepting that those thoughts might be ignored or even vigorously attacked. This discovery might seem obvious to you or others, but to a lifetime codependent this struck me as profound, and a breakthrough. To be clear, I’m a long way from practicing this new art effectively; for one thing it takes me longer to identify the thought than is usually available within the flow of a conversation. I’m typically only able to double back on conversations with your mom. Over time with practice I’m hopeful that I’ll be able to identify and honor thoughts that want to be expressed in real time, which I anticipate will help me engage with people (and especially loved ones) more authentically. But that will take some time.

You might be asking how I differentiate between a thought that wants to be expressed and an outcome that I want to achieve. This is very hard to describe, but I’ll do the best I can. Attaching to an outcome is driven by ego; what I’ve found most commonly is that when I am consumed by ego, my mind races trying to find the perfect argument. I imagine the other party’s responses to all my statements, and scenario plan how I would respond to each. I practice what I would say to different responses over and over, my mind racing in an attempt to craft the perfect words, approach, or strategy. This exercise is often intellectually satisfying, but emotionally exhausting. Once consumed, I usually cannot stop for hours on end. I’m now convinced that the endless mind racing is precisely driven by the impossibility of the task at hand; my body knows I cannot ‘win’ the argument or control the outcome, and yet my ego is convinced that it can and eventually will find the solution.

A thought that wants to be expressed feels different. A thought that wants to be expressed is simple, usually only a few words. And once identified, I feel a resonance in my body. Right now it feels pretty uncomfortable, somehow simultaneously deeply personal and yet seeming as if it comes not ultimately from me but as if it wants to be expressed through me. The idea of expressing the thought stirs a lot of energy in my body: turning my focus to other subjects causes the energy to subside, and turning my focus back to the thought stirs the energy anew. Typically the energy feels as if it comes from somewhere between my stomach and my heart. And to be clear, despite the discomfort of the resonance, I feel a deep knowing that somehow expressing the thought will bring me into alignment.

Anyway, the purpose of this note isn’t to suggest that you can just say whatever you want and dissociate from the responses of others. That would just be another act of the ego. Rather, the purpose of the note is, like so many of the others, mostly about helping you to know me better in the thought that maybe it will help you navigate the world someday. I had a thought that wanted to be expressed, and so I honor that thought with this note to you. What it means to you and what you choose to do with it, I will leave for you to decide for yourselves.

I love you dearly,

Dad

Return from Hiatus

November 3, 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

It’s been almost 2 months since my last note. In that time, I’ve garnered more potential topics to cover than I can track. As a result, I feel slightly overwhelmed by the decision of which topic to cover. In order to overcome the overwhelm, I’ve set a very modest goal for today: write a brief, even bad, letter. My hypothesis is that by writing today, I will establish momentum that makes it easier for me to write again on Monday (or Tuesday, depending on how schedules evolve). Also, by keeping the goal modest, I allow myself to move past the temptation to feel as though my topic and writing need somehow justify the hiatus. Perhaps said differently, I am setting a goal that prevents me from making perfect the enemy of good.

So today I just want to discuss briefly why the hiatus, and the recent change I hope will allow me to write more frequently going forward. As it turns out, the two of you are intimately involved.

Last school year Leland was enrolled in an afterschool program at the campus where Everett attended preschool. This allowed your mom and me to pick the two of you up together after work. We had already paid for the full year, so we just let you finish out the year. After I quit my job, I would periodically pick you up early to take you somewhere to play; most days however I used that time to catch up on things I wanted or needed to do.

This year Everett enrolled in Kindergarten at Leland’s elementary school, and Leland seemed like he was getting bored with the afterschool program. So I decided not to enroll you there this year, at least not at the beginning of the year. Instead, I decided to experiment with not enrolling you in afterschool at all, and just picked you up from school directly. The experiment’s results have been mixed: I’ve enjoyed spending the extra time with you, and you’ve enjoyed playing with each other and (to a lesser extent) me; conversely I’ve had far less time to myself to do things like write, and frankly I think you’ve gotten a little bored.

I don’t regret not signing you up for after school to start the year: as mentioned above I’ve enjoyed the time with you and you enjoyed the time with each other; also, after a pretty busy and hectic summer, I think you both enjoyed some downtime to recharge your batteries a bit. But after a couple months, I think we have refilled our cups in terms of feeling caught up with each other and generally feeling replenished and rejuvenated. In the meantime, I was finding that I was struggling to keep up with things I wanted to do (including writing), and that I was starting to feel frustrated as a result.

The change came parent/teacher conference week. Your school let you out at lunchtime all week so that your teachers had time to meet with parents. Your school’s afterschool program sent a note announcing that they would take drop-ins (for a fee, of course) that week, which enabled me to run an experiment. I signed you up for afterschool twice that week. To my surprise, you were both excited. Early in the school year, you had both expressed desire not to join an afterschool program, and I assumed you still wanted to avoid afterschool. What I did not appreciate was that many of your friends were attending the afterschool program, and so you actually wanted to participate. That pilot week you enjoyed the program so much that you asked to keep going, and so I signed you up (for now) on a part time basis (3 days/wk) ongoing.

I’m excited for the two of you because this afterschool program broadly offers free play with a few structured activities; from what I can tell, it looks like a really good place for you to be and play with your friends. I’m also excited for me, because I get another 12 hours/wk to myself, which I think will help me return to writing regularly. I very much recognize the irony that I am exchanging time writing the future you instead of spending time with you now; but the truth is that we write to discover ourselves, and share our writing with those with whom we hope to share our discoveries. And so I think this will be a win for all involved: again, you both seem energized and stimulated by the opportunity to spend time playing with friends, and I look forward to writing again.

Of course, the transition has not been without its bumps. Earlier this week Leland announced that Everett “got into a fight with a 5th grader”. When I asked for more details, Leland explained that, while playing wall-ball with the older kids, Everett kept catching and kicking the ball away. I looked at Everett, who had a forced smile on his face suggesting he knew he had done something wrong but didn’t exactly understand why. Somehow I recognized this behavior sounded like a plea for attention, and so I asked “did you want to play with Leland?” I’ll never forget Everett’s response: I knew right away I had found the issue. Everett whimpered “uh huh”, his face fell, and he said “I wanted to play with Leland!” as he cried and cried. Everett just missed playing with his big brother; the two of you played together basically every day after school for almost three months, and suddenly Leland was off playing with older kids three days a week.

I pulled Leland aside and told him that if Everett didn’t enjoy afterschool (and he’s complained about going a couple of times this past week), then I would have to pull him out; and if I pulled Everett out I would have to pull Leland out too. Leland said “but the reason I want to go to afterschool is to play with my friends!”. I said “I know. And I’m not saying you have to play with Everett. But I am just telling you the truth. I’m also suggesting that you have the ability to figure this out.” My strong suspicion is that even just acknowledging Everett and helping him feel seen, safe, and welcome in this new environment (he’s in an afterschool program of K-5th graders, after all!) will be enough to help Everett thrive. Of course Leland is so pragmatic and logic-driven that he doesn’t appreciate Everett’s emotional needs nor how Leland can help. But that’s why I challenged Leland in the way that I did: left to his own devices Leland won’t notice or adjust, but in my experience when prodded Leland is able to find solutions that suit his personality but meet the needs of the more emotionally attuned/needy in his orbit (especially his dad and brother). So I didn’t want to tell Leland specifically what to do nor how to do it, but I did want to give him a prod so that he could find a solution that worked for both himself and the little brother that missed playing with him.

I love you both.

Love,

Dad

Spiritual journey

September 8, 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

I mentioned in a previous letter that I engaged in ‘spiritual direction’ with the minister at the church I attend. Recently the minister alerted me to a group forming that will engage in specific exercises in spiritual direction over the next 9 months. From what I’ve learned, a local minister will lead the group; the group will kick-off and wrap with all day retreats; in between the group will meet bi-weekly, engage in 1-1 meetings with the minister in the off weeks, and complete daily assignments in scripture reading and meditation. I had been looking for a personal development community, and had explored secular options through my coach, or perhaps even attending Adult Children of Alcoholics meetings. But what I am ideally looking for is a spiritual growth community, not just a personal development community. And so I have decided to give this group a try.

I met with the organizing minister a couple days ago. He asked me about my spiritual journey. My answer, in retrospect, was sufficiently revealing that I’d like to summarize it for you here.

I grew up in small town East Texas, which is (or was, at the very least) part of the Bible Belt. This meant that I was surrounded by evangelical Christians. I grew up in the Presbyterian church, which is one of the more intellectually oriented of the Protestant denominations. The implication was that I was a bit of an outlier [I believe I used the word ‘weirdo’] in my community.

Somewhere between high school and college (and I really don’t remember the timing any more precisely than that) I recall understanding that I was meant to surrender to God. I explicitly remember saying to God something along the lines of “I know I’m meant to surrender, but I’m not ready yet”. My belief was that surrendering to God would be too hard, too all-encompassing, and maybe even a little too vulnerable. First, I wanted to go off and take care of a few things. Namely, I wanted to establish my career, achieve some financial security, get married and start a family, and (if I’m being truly honest) achieve some status in life. I expected that I would circle back to God at some point, but wanted to keep God at arm’s length for a bit.

What ensued was two decades of emptiness and hollowness. In particular, the career to which I dedicated most of my time and energy provided for me and my family financially, but largely at the expense of my soul.

I started working with a coach a few years ago. She taught me that our intellectual mind was not our only source of knowing. She taught that our bodies and emotions were also sources of knowing that our society (and I in particular) had neglected in service of intellectual knowing. Through the process of working with her, I’ve come to understand that we also have access to spiritual ways of knowing.

A couple of years ago, I started having interactive meditations [what I’ve referred to in prior letters as ‘visions‘]. In these, I am an active participant, but other entities appear and act independently of any conscious thought that I might have.

My first reaction to these meditations was to assume I should seek guidance and expertise. But then I realized that whatever I was doing seemed to be working, and that I wanted to explore it alone, at least for a bit. I didn’t seem to need expertise right away: somehow I seemed to be able to access what I needed. It’s hard to explain those experiences exactly; what I can say is that I was learning things that didn’t seem to be coming from me, and yet somehow I felt a certain confidence that these things were real and true, even if I couldn’t explain them (or how I knew them) to anyone else in a way that would make logical sense.

Eventually I came to understand that it was time for me to find ‘others’. It had long since come to me in a meditation that there were ‘others’ who experienced this spiritual dimension in ways we would find relatable, and that I would eventually be called to go find them. And now (about the end of last year or the beginning of this year) that call was coming.

Around that time I remembered the Presbyterian church in my neighborhood (I moved into the neighborhood a little over a year ago, and had driven past this church several times). My immediate reaction was “I’m not going to find what I’m looking for in the Church”. As I mentioned before, Presbyterians especially (and Christian denominations more broadly) tend to intellectualize our spirituality. We have a philosophical understanding of God. We have an intellectual understanding of Jesus, at least as he’s taught to us by our ministers and priests. But we really don’t understand the Holy Spirit, that energy and life force that surrounds us and connects us to everything. I just never thought I would find what I was looking for in a church, much less a Presbyterian church.

In fact, I assumed I would need to go find a Buddhist monk or irreligious spiritualist to help me cultivate my spiritual practice. Around this time my uncle, who I would describe as a Catholic intellectual, reminded me that Christianity does indeed have a long tradition of mysticism, just mostly coming from Catholic tradition. Catholicism has had a complicated relationships with their mystics, but they at least have them.

Ultimately I realized that I would likely need to cast a lot of lines in order to catch what I was looking for, and decided to give my neighborhood Presbyterian church a try. In that first visit, several things happened that felt like God hitting me over the head and telling me “this is where you are meant to be”. And so I’ve been attending most weeks since, and have engaged with the minister in spiritual direction. It turns out that spiritual practice does exist in the modern Church, even the Protestant traditions, though I don’t get the impression it’s yet popular.

I’ve come to believe some crazy things through my spiritual journey over the last couple years, particularly from my meditations. Christians talk about the First Covenant being with God as represented in the Old Testament and the Second Covenant being with Jesus as represented in the New Testament. Well, I believe we will soon enter a Third Covenant, this time with the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit is universal: virtually every major religion and tradition believes in some version of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit, Chi, Buddha Nature, Atman Brahmin, and Consciousness are but a few different names for what I believe to be the same thing: the energy force that flows around and through us, that connects us, and that is available to all of us as a source of knowing and guidance, if we can just get still and listen. And so, I believe that going into covenant with the Holy Spirit will be unifying for humanity across cultures and religions.

I believe that a spiritual reawakening is coming, and probably quickly. I believe that I am relatively early, but that others are coming, and that I am in part meant to help create a path for others to follow.

I believe that one way to interpret the epidemic of overwhelm is that God is tapping us on the shoulder more firmly than before, trying to get our attention. So it’s getting harder and harder for us to ignore God’s call. And so we bury ourself in myriad distractions in order to avoid getting still and hearing God’s call for us.

I believe that one way to interpret our modern political and social strife is that various of our institutions are dying. Depending on the institution, one political side is attacking it and accelerating the demise, while the other side rallies to its defense, not ready to say goodbye. Said differently: we are grieving the death of our institutions in different ways. But what we all need to understand is that some things need to die in order make room for God to usher in a new era. But I also believe that these changes are likely to be turbulent, and therefore scary; so we should treat the grieving and scared with grace.

I believe Christians have been looking for the Christ to come back in the wrong place. We’ve been looking for the Christ to come back in the form of a singular man. I believe that the Christ is meant to be revived in each of us. Jesus wasn’t meant to be our savior, Jesus was meant to be our guide and mentor; he was meant to show us what was possible. We are meant to follow his lead, and realize that we are each fully human as well as fully divine. We are meant to manifest the Kingdom on earth; not in the afterlife, but in this lifetime. And we are meant to do this by tapping into our internal source, our internal connection to God.

I believe that each of us has, inside of us, a portal of sorts to interact with God. I often think of the metaphor of a radio station: we are meant to tune into God’s station. We are each set slightly differently, and so will each receive a slightly different message from God. But our purpose is to tune in. Of course, tuning in is hard, and remaining tuned in perhaps even harder (many of us have experienced extreme closeness to God; unfortunately most of us have also experienced feeling that closeness fade over time as our radios went back out of tune).

Over the last year I finally surrendered myself to God. I asked God for my calling, and word came back almost immediately: “you’re not ready; you need to heal”. It was true, I needed to heal physically, emotionally, and spiritually [as is, I think, reasonably documented in these letters]. And so, I quit my job several months ago, and have been on a healing journey focused on exercise, meditation, and writing.

And now I am looking for a community. I have come to understand that it is my calling to stand firm and walk my path, and resist temptation to leave my path and walk with others. Similarly, I should resist the temptation to call others off their path in order to walk with me on mine. I see an image of people each walking their own path, but somehow reaching out metaphysically across time and space, holding hands. We support each other and buttress each other, and provide community for each other, while we each walk in our own paths with God.

[I didn’t say this to the minister, but I’ll admit that I’m not married to this journey being explicitly Christian. I don’t believe God is a Christian God or a Jewish God or a Hindu God. I believe there is one ultimate God that constantly reaches out to humanity to communicate with us; I believe across time cultures have experienced God in different ways and captured and emphasized different learnings. What is, I think, somewhat constant across time and culture and religion and individual difference, is an ability to have a direct interaction. Anyone can do it, though it does take some time and effort figuring out how to dial into the right channel and receive and interpret the signals available to us. For now, I’m intrigued to explore this spirituality from a Christian perspective, for a couple reasons. First, I’m steeped in Christian history and knowledge, so the learning curve should not be steep. Second, I’m finding that reading scripture through this new lens of spirituality opens up new worlds of interpretation. Third, I live in a country full of Christians, or former Christians; it will be useful to understand whether I am offering those Christians something fundamentally new and different, or something connected to our Christian past and traditions (and if so, how). I may or may not remain on an explicitly Christian path. My hypothesis is that I am learning to build the bridge from Christianity to what comes after, though I believe this less strongly than I once did.]

I love you both, and I hope you find this note useful. Part of me wishes you a deep personal connection and journey with God. Part of me very much doesn’t: a personal journey with God is humbling, exposed, vulnerable, and (so far anyway) constantly uncomfortable. And yet, what I’ve experienced of the alternative is worse. If forced to choose, I’d rather walk with God alone than walk without God but alongside all humanity; fortunately, I don’t think we have to make that choice (though sometimes it may feel like we do).

What I do hope for you is an earnest struggle. Struggle with your beliefs, struggle to understand your spiritual identity. By the time you are adults, I anticipate the culture’s relationship with God will have evolved from the time I write (it has evolved dramatically over the course of my lifetime, at an accelerating rate). But your spiritual identity and beliefs are the one thing nobody can dictate but you; they are not collaborative or shared. They can and will be influenced by others and the culture around you, but you yourselves will eventually want to sit down and determine what you believe as part of who you are.

I love you,

Dad

Codependent

Summer 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

In retrospect, I’m surprised I took so long to learn the word. The first I remember hearing it said was by a dear friend who grew up the child of an alcoholic. I never asked him what the word meant, and was never curious to look it up. Your mom introduced me to a fascinating podcast between Tim Ferriss and Jim Dethmer where Dethmer offered a definition; my recollection is that he defined a codependent as someone who assigns themselves responsibility for another’s happiness or emotional wellbeing.

Somehow I like the word (and Dethmer’s definition of) ‘codependent’ more than the world ‘enabler’. For whatever reason, ‘enabler’ feels like a loaded word to me, as if the enabler is being blamed for the actions of the enabled. I’ve always imagined an enabler as someone who ignored or tolerated unacceptable behavior, and/or shielded others from the consequences of their unacceptable behavior. I don’t think I do that. But I definitely make myself responsible for others’ emotions and wellbeing, especially those I love.

Your Grampa was an alcoholic. I think the preferred phrasing in alcoholic parlance is present tense: your Grampa is a recovering alcoholic. I think of it as a past-tense phenomenon, because he’s been sober for almost 20 years.

My grandparents marked evenings with a single cocktail. Both my mom’s and dad’s parents would, somewhere around 5pm, mix whisky in with Coke (eventually I think Diet Coke replaced Coke), and have their evening cocktail. That was most of the drinking I ever saw any of them do, but they had their daily drink, as far as I recall, every day.

I assume my dad started the same way, though I’ll admit I don’t remember. He also mixed whisky (Ancient Age was the common brand across the family) with Diet Coke, so perhaps I just assume he was modeling his parents and in-laws.

I don’t precisely remember when my dad’s drinking became problematic; my perception is that I was around 8 or 9. But somewhere along the way my dad had too many drinks. And then he did it again. And again. So started a cycle that came and went for almost two decades.

My dad was a ‘high-functioning’ alcoholic: he maintained a successful career, and carried out all his traditional roles as dad and husband. For years, I don’t think anyone outside of the family had any idea. He would drink too much at home, at night, and for the first several years rarely drank in public or during the daytime.

Mostly what I remember is that, when he drank, my dad got stubborn, obstinate, and kinda mean. He would say something meant to provoke, usually directed toward my sister or me. When we objected, he would often anchor on whatever he said that agitated us. We would profess or argue why he was wrong, and he would just repeat the thing that upset us until we were enraged. My sister and I didn’t have the tools to regulate our responses, so this cycle repeated. At the time I didn’t really understand alcohol or alcoholism; all I knew was that my dad acted differently sometimes, in a manner out of character from what I typically encountered and anything I knew before.

As I got older, I began to understand that it was the drinking that made my dad mean. And I learned not to react when he tried to get me upset. I remember my younger sister took longer to learn that lesson (she was younger, after all), and so she got upset more often than I did for awhile. In retrospect I remember just being sad at how often my dad, or the person I knew to be my dad, wasn’t around. He was too often represented by this seemingly soulless, mindless, mildly malevolent avatar.

The most painful experience I remember was on my birthday. Our family went to lunch at one of our favorite restaurants. It might have been on a Sunday: I vaguely recall that we arrived wearing church attire. Also, my dad usually didn’t go to church with us, so that would explain how I would have been surprised when he arrived drunk. Dad’s drunkenness on this occasion was surprising partly because it was daytime, and partly because it was in public. The surprise merely added to my shock, anger, and frustration; I distinctly remember feeling like my dad didn’t even bother showing up for my birthday celebration. I was utterly disgusted to share my birthday celebration with this grotesque likeness instead of the real thing.

I confronted my dad on occasion. I remember writing him a letter and putting it on his pillow after that birthday. Later, when my dad came drunk to one of my baseball games, I told him if he ever showed up drunk again, I would quit the team. I loved baseball, and my dad loved coaching me playing baseball. While I had learned to tolerate my dad’s drinking at home in private, I wasn’t willing to be humiliated in public. I was willing to give up something I loved to avoid being humiliated, and I think my dad knew it and believed me when I said it. Each time I confronted my dad, he reduced his drinking, usually dramatically, usually for a period of months.

The last time I confronted my dad was shortly before he stopped drinking. While I don’t think my confrontation was the primary reason why he stopped, I’m still glad I said what I said. My dad had just retired, and his mom had just passed away. He was serving as the executer on his mom’s will (selling her house, giving away her things, dividing up her assets with his older brother). He was stressed and grieving, and drinking more than ever before. He was drinking from the time he woke up in the morning until he went to bed at night.

He asked me to come home (I had moved away at this point) to decide what things of my grandmother’s I wanted before he gave the rest away. At some point on that trip, I told my dad I really valued being able to come to him for advice on my career, and was starting to realize I would want his advice on how to be a husband and eventually a father. I was genuinely worried he was going to drink himself to death; I don’t recall if I said so directly, but I do think I expressed what I intended. I’m still proud of that conversation, although I’m not entirely sure why.

I’ve since developed a lot more understanding and compassion for my dad’s drinking. When I had you two, I began to feel an entirely new level of pressure. Suddenly the pressures of trying to be a good father, good husband, good breadwinner, and having a successful career seemed like a lot. I found myself wishing I had better tools or outlets to let go of the stress I was feeling, and realized that my dad had probably felt the same way when my sister and I came into the world. I don’t know for sure, but I think drinking too much was a way for my dad to numb himself, and not feel all the stress and pressure he was experiencing when he was sober. So while I don’t condone or approve of my dad’s excessive drinking, I no longer hold anger toward my dad. I’m also hugely grateful he’s maintained his sobriety, and been the type of dad to me and grandfather to you two that I knew he could be. I love my dad dearly and think he is a genuinely remarkable person, father, and grandfather.

Up until a few months ago I would have told you that my dad’s drinking hadn’t really impacted me. With a few embarrassing exceptions, he was only drunk at home. He never hit us, he never exposed us to financial insecurity (in fact, quite the opposite, he provided for us quite well). He mostly just got belligerent or was just merely emotionally absent, and I eventually learned how to deal with it.

My first inkling that my dad’s drinking had lingering effects came a little over a year ago. I got pretty burned out at work during the Covid pandemic: my workload increased both at home and at work, but my outlets to decompress (especially connecting with friends in person) decreased. Eventually I hit a wall where I just couldn’t function at work, and asked my boss for some time off. I’ll never forget my first day off: I went to the grocery store and did a load of laundry, and I was completely exhausted and overwhelmed. I had become so overwhelmed that I could no longer handle even trivial levels of stimulus.

During the time off I started seeing a therapist. I don’t remember how it came up (funny how the mind works) but I divulged that my dad had been an alcoholic. My therapist encouraged me to attend an Al-Anon meeting (Al-Anon is designed for family members of alcoholics, especially spouses, to get help). I attended a meeting, and felt deeply uncomfortable. I really, really didn’t want to be there, but I decided that was a sign I was precisely where I needed to be. For better and worse, that was the only meeting I attended.

More recently, when reading about my new diet, Dr Ornish referenced in passing something to the effect that sugar consumption was not linked with heard disease. This triggered me: I know I have read the exact opposite conclusion from other doctors. Seeing different facts stated by different doctors outraged me. I could sense, in real time, that my nervous system was going haywire. I asked myself why, and the answer came back almost immediately: because these ‘experts’ disagreeing reminded me of my dad’s drinking. My parents always, always, always presented a united front at home. They always gave my sister and me the impression that they were aligned. Except when Dad drank. That was the only time I could sense division between them. Somehow, seeing experts disagree reminded me of that division.

Additional realizations came quickly. I had always feared division or misalignment between authority figures. This fear of division between authority figures hampered my career. In many ways, wading into the division between leaders and securing alignment is the job of aspiring leaders. But instead of wading in, I instinctively ran away, and in the process left it to others to drive alignment. As a result, despite plenty of technical competence, I was routinely passed over for career advancement precisely because I was unwilling to embrace tension and drive resolution. I simply couldn’t handle the conflict.

Suddenly I saw how much of my adult life had been shaped, or at least influenced, by growing up with an alcoholic. More importantly, I was forced to acknowledge how I had been unaware of a major driving force in my adult life for almost two decades. Put most simply, I have been living my adult life for others, attempting to please my parents, your mom, my friends, and my bosses and coworkers. In the process, I neglected my own wants needs so consistently that I lost awareness of what my wants and needs even were. And in the process of neglecting myself, I allowed my soul to wither. The joyful, creative, energetic child and adolescent I was would barely recognize the person I became.

I then realized how many codependents fill my life. I don’t think my mom was an enabler, but I do think she is a codependent. Your mom is a codependent who, to her great credit, is working very hard, with help, to become more aware, nurturing, and protective of her own wants and needs. My two closest friends are children of alcoholics. As I think about my closest relationships and those to whom I feel most naturally connected, I mostly (now) see people who focus on others to the detriment of themselves.

To be clear, I do not label my loved ones as codependent in insult. Indeed, codependency is intrinsically linked to all the things I love about them: they are deeply empathetic, they genuinely care for others, and they help put some focus on me when I do not. We codependents can intuit what others are feeling, and can on some level even feel what others are feeling. Part of why I have surrounded myself with codependents is that we understand each other, we empathize with each other, and we try to look out for each other.

Unfortunately, with codependents it’s somewhat inevitable that we also try to control each other. We lean into our empathetic capacities, and begin to avoid the hard work of introspection. We convince ourselves that we prioritize others from a place of selflessness, when in fact we increasingly come from a place of avoidance. But we come to resent our our needs not getting met, and become bitter and frustrated. And so we begin to attach unnecessary significance to the actions and wellbeing of others. We come to believe that because we have sacrificed so much of ourselves, others owe us in the form of following our advice and in doing so achieving happiness.

I came to understand all of the above observing myself. But once we see what we have avoided seeing in ourselves, we cannot help but see the same behaviors in others. Which helps explain why this summer has been so challenging for your dad.

We’ve had a wonderful summer together. You enjoyed summer camps focused on sports, chess, and learning to code, among other topics. Your days ended early, and so I was able to spend much more time with you than normal. And we travelled extensively, spending weeks with my family and closest friends.

And yet, precisely because these were my closest relationships, the timing of interacting with all of my favorite codependents precisely as I came into awareness of and attempted to heal my codependent tendencies, made these trips confusing and challenging.

In my meditations, I came upon a metaphor of a relationship between two codependents being like two people holding ropes tying us together. Each participant holds one end of a rope tying us to the other. In the meditations, I found myself letting go of my end of the rope, understanding that I was letting go of my attempts to control others, and letting go of my tacit acceptance of responsibility to be controlled by them. And so, when I spent time with my closest friends and family, invariably I found myself confused by the state of flux: in letting to of my end of the rope, I was unilaterally changing the terms of my relationships. But those ropes, and those relationships, tethered me. They weren’t just restrictive; they were also stabilizing. These relationships have been my anchors, my pillars, my sources of stability and strength throughout my adult life. Letting go of the rope felt deeply destabilizing. I spent the summer feeling untethered, floating, chaotic.

Of course, the temptation is to pick up the rope and resume the relationship as it always has been. But that would be inauthentic. And on some level I know that by letting go of the unhealthy aspects of these relationships, I am making space for healthy relationships to grow in their place.

But what a terrifying prospect! What if my friends and family cannot accept this journey that I am on? What if they reject a transformed, non-codependent version of your dad? If I am not trying to help/control them, and I am not implicitly accepting their attempts to help/control me, will our relationships survive? Or am I saying goodbye to all of my closest relationships? What a sad and scary thought! Sad because these are people I genuinely love, and so I find myself grieving the end of my closest relationships, at least in their current format (and the only format I’ve ever known). And scary precisely because these relationships have been my anchors, my pillars, my sources of strength; what would I do without them?

This relationship struggle is, I find, part of a deeper pattern of healing and of death and rebirth this year, via the simple act of letting go. First, as is reasonably documented in prior letters, I processed and let go of lots of fear. More recently, I have processed and let go of lots of sadness. The letting go has been liberating; I feel lighter and freer. Now I find myself letting go of things that I take to be, on balance, healthy and good. My relationships might not be perfect, but they have been overwhelmingly positive. In fact, my relationships have been my most valuable adult possessions, by far. But my meditations predicted this: I came to realize that the process of letting go started with those things that were painful and unhealthy, but would move to include things that were good and brought me joy. I’m coming to understand that surrendering to God means being willing to surrender everything. Which is not to say that I expect to live a life without loved ones, friendships, and family. But I do think it means surrendering those things, even those you think you cannot live without, that need to be renewed. I am coming to understand that God has infinite capacity to bring love and joy and fulfillment into our lives, but that we must first make space and stillness for God to operate in and through us.

Everett, you will want to watch for codependent tendencies. You are deeply empathetic, almost entirely relationship driven, and feel your emotions deeply. Already, you seem to define yourself in relationship to others. You enjoy bringing joy to others (and are gifted at doing so). You dislike negative emotions in others, to the extent that you take actions to make those negative emotions go away. I anticipate you will need to cultivate awareness of your wants and needs, so that you don’t lose sight of yourself in a relentless prioritization of others.

Leland, bless you, you do not seem to share your brother’s, dad’s, and mom’s codependent tendencies. You seem to have an intuitive understanding of who you are, a full awareness of your wants and needs, and a willingness to take care of yourself as a priority. If anything, I suspect you will need to practice empathy toward those you care about and awareness of their needs and how you can help those you love take care of themselves.

As we start the new school year, I find myself looking forward to prioritizing self care again. After a summer spent interacting with loved ones, I sincerely look forward to a fall focused on exercise, meditation, and writing. But I’m also grateful for this summer, for time spent with my favorite people, and for exposure to and a deeper understanding of the introspective work I need to do next. I’m still just taking one step at a time, but I’m grateful to know where to take my next step.

I love you both. Thank you for a wonderful summer, for being my teacher and a catalyst and source of motivation for my healing journey.

Love,

Dad

Boundaries

July 10, 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

A movie came out last week called Sound of Freedom. The movie came into my awareness via Twitter. I watched Jordan Peterson (an interesting but controversial intellectual) interview the movie’s main actor (James Caveziel) as well as the man who inspired the movie (Tim Ballard). From that interview I learned Ballard left a job in Homeland Security combatting child sex trafficking to set up a private operation aimed at recovering kids overseas (since Homeland has no jurisdiction beyond US borders). Ballard suggested that, much like the drug trade, sex trafficking mostly occurs overseas in order to satisfy U.S. demand. The interview delved into Ballard’s faith, the leap of faith he took to leave his job (and pension) at Homeland, and what Ballard (from field experience) and Peterson (from his work as a clinical psychologist) have learned about evil. It was an interesting interview, and I found myself glad that the movie existed and that the story was being told. I was completely unaware that child sex trafficking is a significant problem; assuming it is, I’m glad it was brought to our attention so that we can start the discussion of what we will do about it.

Fast forward a few days, and outside of conservative outlets the media response to the movie has been acutely critical. The Guardian, Rolling Stone, and Washington Post have all run articles about the film; I also saw an interview clip discussing the movie on CNN. The theme across all of these articles appears to be that potential viewers should stay away lest they get sucked into QAnon conspiracies (QAnon is a loosely organized community of conspiracy theorists; from what little I know the theories seem rather outlandish, including a relatively core theory that elites are running a global pedophilia ring). None of the articles genuinely address the movie’s core assertions, and yet they (particularly the Guardian and Rolling Stone) dismiss out-of-hand whether anyone should really be bothered.

So what does the movie claim? Well, right in the preview it claims that child slavery due to sex trafficking has surpassed the illegal arms trade in value, and will soon pass the drug trade. It claims that the growth rate of children going into slavery is astronomical. And (though not in the preview) the movie claims (correctly, at least according to Variety‘s Owen Gleibrerman) that there are more people enslaved now than when slavery was legal.

Are any of the movie’s claims accurate? I don’t know. In a healthy society with a healthy media, we would agree on the underlying facts first, and only then would we debate what we should do with those facts. Unfortunately, ours is not a healthy society; nor are we supported by a healthy media. I’m utterly stunned that the Guardian, Rolling Stone, CNN, and Washington Post dedicated time and space to disavowing QAnon without addressing the volume and growth rate of child sex trafficking. I certainly respect media outlets’ right to correct inaccurate or misleading information. But that doesn’t happen in any of the 3 articles (plus video clip) I’ve found since the movie came out.

For what it’s worth, I do think it’s fair to point out Jim Cavezial’s apparently unseemly connections to QAnon. I also think it’s appropriate to ponder whether an extra-governmental organization like Tim Ballard’s should act in a de facto policing function overseas. And of course it’s completely reasonable (as some reviews have done) to say that the movie is just bad.

But if we’re going to politicize the movie, we should start with whether the movie gets its facts correct. Is the sex trafficking industry as big and growing as fast as claimed? If yes, do ordinary citizens not have a right to be concerned?

All of the above is a very long-winded way of saying…I got triggered and fell into a state of righteousness. And so I am now, partly via this letter, attempting to put down my binoculars and pick up my mirror, to try to understand what I can learn from my reaction. What I’ve found so far:

For one thing, I am reminded not to take on others’ baggage. Charles Bramesco of the Guardian and Miles Klee of Rolling Stone clearly have their own stuff to deal with. I cannot allow myself to get bogged down trying to control their thoughts and actions.

And yet, while I know it to be true, I don’t find this answer particularly gratifying. As far as I can tell, these authors are doing real harm to the world insofar as they are steering people away from a real concern by masquerading opinions as facts. (And even if their conclusions are correct, they infantilize their audience by presenting their conclusions without the underlying facts). Instead of presenting facts and allowing consumers to decide their own level of concern and personal level of involvement, these journalists attempt to steer readers attention away from the issues altogether. Will some reader decide, based on reading this article, not to get involved? If so, how many kids might not be rescued from slavery (or worse yet, prevented from going into slavery altogether) as a result of these articles?

Why wouldn’t Charles Bramesco, Mils Klee, and their editors at the Guardian and Rolling Stone, trust their readership enough to engage them with facts? Why do they insist on filtering those facts (whatever they are), only presenting their readers a conclusion the logic behind which the reader is denied? Do they think so little of their readership, or the world at large, that they feel compelled to attempt to control what we think? What authority do they believe they have over our thoughts? Do they not see that they are fundamentally altering the agreement between reader and journalist without alerting the reader?

Which gets me to the second order answer: sadness. For decades, we’ve gone to our media outlets looking for factual information and opinion pieces underpinned with facts. These articles fit in a broader trend where our media outlets now no longer ‘show their work’ by providing their underlying facts, and indeed sometimes don’t even ground themselves in facts whatsoever. What they don’t seem to realize is how much reputational damage they do, both to themselves and their publications, in the process. Every day people now catch their media outlets, whether via malice or incompetence, spreading false or misleading information. In the process, these outlets erode trust in their brands, journalism at large, our institutions more broadly, and our overall society and culture. This all makes me profoundly sad. More than anything, I am saddened by the direction I think we are headed, and I mourn the loss of trust we had with each other, with our institutions, and with our media. The days where we had an underlying trust in each other are ending, I will miss them, and it saddens me to watch it happen in real time as I prepare to say goodbye.

As much as I might be frustrated by the Guardian or Rolling Stone or journalism at large, I find no joy in watching these institutions degrade themselves. I’m particularly saddened because I think these outlets (like most of their peers) put themselves at existential risk by eroding the trust they have built over time, unnecessarily. These articles are not journalism or even what once passed as opinion pieces; they are attempts at mind control, and are beneath both the institutions that produced them and their readership. We can and should do better, and I don’t understand why we don’t.

Well, to some degree I do understand, and I outlined as much previously. Sex trafficking appears to satisfy all of the challenges I outlined previously: 1) we’re afraid we can’t do it, 2) we can’t seem to acknowledge the magnitude of the problem, 3) we don’t have the mechanisms to address it because it’s global in scope, 4) America’s waning power reduces our ability to solve the problem, 5) people are exhausted with things to worry about (and so some of the argument is really over whether sex trafficking should make our list of primary concerns), and 6) our institutions are outdated and increasingly incapable of dealing with the problems we face today. And so I do understand, but still, seeing this particular institution fail us so dramatically just makes me sad.

The third order answer to why this situation bothers me so is probably the deepest: I feel unequipped to do anything about it. I’d love to pretend that what I mean is that I don’t have access to Charles Bramesco, Mils Klee, and their editors at the Guardian and Rolling Stone in order to attempt to correct them regarding the error of their ways. Alas, I’m referring to something deeper: I doubt I have the internal fortitude to attempt to correct them even if I did have access. This, ultimately, I what I want to explore and practice today.

I’m not comfortable setting or maintaining boundaries. I’m not comfortable identifying nor asking for what I want, nor standing firm in the face of resistance. I’m too eager to please, too afraid of confrontation, and too terrified of being shunned by others. And yet, I cannot escape the conclusion that this scenario calls for confrontation, even if that means putting my social standing at risk.

How to confront Bramesco, Klee, et al? Alas, I don’t find much of the confrontation I see modeled in the world today particularly helpful or worthy of emulating. I recognize that Righteousness is the enemy of truth, so attempting to shame Bramesco and Klee won’t accomplish anything other than increasing our division.

Rather, I need to appeal to the goodness in Bramesco and Klee. I would want to let them know clearly that their actions crossed some boundary into the territory of unacceptable behavior. But I would want to do so without impugning them personally. I would want them to know that I believe they are loved because God loves them and, because of that belief, I have the capacity to show them compassion and love in the face of their errors. More than anything, I would want them to know that they themselves deserve better. Their publications deserve better, their readers deserve better, and the world at large deserves better; but most importantly, Bramesco and Klee deserve better of themselves. They are each capable of doing better and being better; if anything their behavior suggests that they want to be seen, to be corrected, and to be invited into a better world. And so I would want to assure them that a better world exists, and to invite them into it. On another day I’ll outline more about that better world.

I wouldn’t expect them to be convinced in the moment; indeed I would prepare myself for either pretty dramatic pushback or outright dismissal. But I would know that I did my part, and I would hold out faith and hope that I had put something into the world and into their spirit that let them know that they were seen and loved, and that God was calling out to them in an effort to help them find the thing their souls appear to be earnestly looking out for. Somehow, I would trust that my actions were healing, and I would turn the rest over to God.

I doubt I’ll really get the chance to confront Bramesco, Klee, or their editors. In truth, this letter is meant to serve as practice for the next time I get triggered, so that I might be prepared in that moment. Longer term, I’m hoping to show you how I’m approaching a challenge I’m facing, in the hopes that you might know me better and find something of use in your adult years.

I love you,

Dad

Summer check-in, more visions, and a quick health update

June 27, 2023

We are now in our 3rd week of what promises to be a summer full of new experiences and time spent together. I’m doing the best I can at savoring the time, intimately aware that this is time I cannot get back with the two of you, and coming to appreciate that as you grow up and become more independent, our time together will dwindle.

Complicating my effort to maximize my time and presence with you is a pretty steady stream of life learnings coming to me. I am learning new things about myself at perhaps a faster pace than ever before; part of me wishes I could spend much more time writing the two of you, as I find the writing really helps me capture and solidify my learnings (and, hopefully, serves you in adulthood). Of course, it seems more important to spend time with you now, in your youth, than it does to write to you later, in your adulthood. So I anticipate having limited time to write this summer, but will focus on maximizing the value I get from writing nonetheless.

[Also, I’m aware that the apparent dichotomy-between maximizing my fulfillment of the time with you now and writing-is likely more imagined than real. Through my self exploration I am almost certainly more able to be fully present and enjoy the time I spend with you. And spending time with you almost certainly helps me identify learnings faster than I would otherwise. Just as one example, in my last note I observed how much I miss being Gran’s little boy; I don’t think it’s coincidence that learning came to me while I spend time with the two of you at exactly the same age I miss being myself.]

Visualizations, or what I have previously called visions, are starting to return in my meditations. The form and format are very different than before. I’ll talk more about the prior format in coming letters; for now I’ll just say that the entry into the visions formed a pattern. They all started generally the same way, as I was intentional about visualizing certain things to start every vision. Now, I am finding that if I remain still and focused long enough, visions will sometimes just appear. One recent example:

I was in the ocean, near enough to shore that I could walk back to land. I saw a dog out in deeper water, bobbing in waves. Worried for the dog, I swam out to rescue him. As I approached, he floated away. I kept swimming; he floated away again. I started to get frustrated that my efforts to rescue the dog weren’t being rewarded. I even started to get angry that the dog didn’t appear to be putting any effort in swimming back to me so that I could rescue him. And that’s when it occurred to me that I had assumed the dog needed rescuing. What if he didn’t? At this moment I realized that the ocean was God. I was swimming in the ocean of God; of course the dog didn’t need saving. I was attached to the shore, and the belief that I needed to be able to return to shore (and bring others with me). I realized that I needed to surrender to the ocean, to God, and did so. Suddenly I was far from shore, out to sea. I had anticipated calm, peaceful waters; instead, I was caught in the middle of a storm. The waves were enormous, and growing. I rose with the wave, and then fell between the waves. I would drop 20, 30, eventually 50 feet at a time, crashing back into the water and being buffeted by the next wave. What had happened? Hadn’t I surrendered? Why had the ocean suddenly become so scary.

And then I realized: being with God doesn’t make the storm go away. The storm still happens. This realization led to the next: being with God can let you release the fear of the storm. The storm itself may be unavoidable, but it’s the fear of the storm that makes it so painful, so unpleasant, the thing we work so hard to avoid. Once I accepted the storm, and again surrendered, I came to be at peace with the waves; I did not enjoy them, but I no longer struggled against them. I accepted the storm and the outcome it might bring, recognizing that I was powerless against the storm except to make it worse through fear. Fear was more likely to get me injured or killed than surrender. I remained alert, aware, and reactive: the storm required my faculties and awareness. I just accepted that the outcome would be what it would, and then was just there, in and with the storm.

The next day’s meditation began with discomfort in my stomach. Rather than resist (my typical response), I engaged with it. I put my awareness on the location of the discomfort, welcomed it, and asked it what it wanted me to know. At that moment I felt discomfort in my chest. I asked my stomach if the chest discomfort was what it wanted me to know, and felt another discomfort in my chest. I thanked my stomach for guiding me, and brought my awareness to the discomfort in my chest. As I approached my heart I came upon a guard dog. I welcomed the guard dog and asked him what purpose he served: to protect me, and those who threaten me. I hugged the guard dog and thanked him for his service. I asked if he would stand down, as an experiment, knowing that we could always call him back into service if needed. When he agreed, I asked him to take me to what he was protecting. The guard dog brought me to a walled off area. I asked the wall what purpose it served: to protect me. I asked the wall if it would be willing to open, knowing that we could close it again if needed. The wall opened and receded out of sight, revealing my heart. My heart was grey and sickly. I thanked my heart for pumping and keeping me alive. I asked how I could help: “love”. I asked if there was anything else it wanted me to know: “I can heal”. I asked if there was anything else: it asked me to light it on fire, to burn away dead tissue and make room for new, healthy tissue to grow. I set my heart on fire: the outside burned quickly, while the fire took time to get into the veins and arteries and clear away the dead tissue. My heart looked stronger, healthier. I asked my heart if there was anything else: I saw your mom and my mom (the people I care about most, and therefore the people capable of hurting me most) sending hurtful energy toward me, toward my chest. I asked my heart how it wanted me to respond: “let them hurt you; let them see that they hurt you”. I sensed that this wasn’t the whole answer, so I stayed with it: “send them your compassion; they aren’t hurting you, they are hurting themselves”. Rather than resist, run away from, or fight against hurtful energy, I just let it calmly pass. My heart was unscathed and untouched, and I realized that only my efforts to resist brought hurt.

I asked if there was anything else. A hole opened up in another dimension, overlapping with my heart. The hole was black, peaceful, and calm. I sensed that it was a portal to another dimension, to God, to an endless source of love and energy. I sat and bathed in the healing presence of that loving energy for quite awhile. After awhile, I asked my heart if I could be leave for today: yes.

The first vision is, I think, reasonably self explanatory. The second interests me for a few reasons. First, I’m particularly intrigued with the parallel between stomach discomfort leading to awareness of chest discomfort and the months of heartburn-e.g. stomach pain-preceding awareness of blockages in my heart. Second, the book I mentioned in my last note advocates visiting with the heart and engaging with it in intentional visualization, in a format reasonably similar to what I outlined. The book specifically mentions that people with heart disease often come upon a wall around the heart. What was unique to mine, at least relative to my book, was the guard dog. I’m stunned by this metaphor: I have always lashed out at those who hurt me, or in particular those I think might hurt me. I lash out very rarely, and only with those I care most about-e.g. those with the potential to hurt me.

And the metaphor around the black portal I find particularly interesting. I’ve been wrestling with an idea paralleling physics and spirituality. Physicists have struggled for decades with calculations that imply that ~90% of the universe is made up of dark matter and dark energy, despite the fact that we’ve never observed and know very little about either. We really only understand the aspects of the universe (like stars) that emit light, or those (like planets) that reflect it. Similarly, at least in Western faiths we tend to think of God as our source of light. And so what I think I discovered is that God is in fact both a source of light and dark. To be clear, this dark is not the same as the darkness of shadows, wherein an entity merely blocks out the light. The dark aspect of God is different: infinite, limitless, a source of peace and endless calm. Or at least those are my preliminary thoughts. Interestingly, the idea of God being the source of both light and dark seems, at least on the surface, to have parallels with the yin/yang concept from Chinese spirituality; and the idea of God as vast emptiness seems to have a parallel in the Zen buddhist concept of mu. I’m not sufficiently knowledgeable on either yin/yang nor mu to comment much further, other than to say this is an area I will probably continue to explore.

More broadly, I have this sense that physics and spirituality are both knocking on similar doors from different sides. What I understand of quantum physics, much like dark matter and dark energy, feels related to spirituality to me. For whatever reason, I have this suspicion that our mystics and physicists will soon see our understandings of the universe merge.

In one brief bit of health related news: my cardiologist yesterday confirmed that I have no major blockages in my arteries. So the good news is that apparently I am not at immediate risk of a heart attack. This gives me some space to pursue longer term solutions, like attempting to heal via diet, exercise, meditation, and visualization of healing. And somehow through all of this I am beginning to understand that my health and spiritual journeys are not separate, but somehow the same journey observed from different angles. I don’t fully understand this idea yet, but the simplicity of the idea gives me some peace, and some comfort that I will be able to focus on the enormity of the task at hand.

I love you,

Dad

Bickering

June 23, 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

You are both attending a sports camp this week, as part of your summer break. You are both getting lots of exercise and time outside, and are coming home physically exhausted. You aren’t learning traditional sports in the way that I had hoped, but you are playing active games that mix in aspects of traditional sports. Most importantly, you are both having lots of fun.

This morning I asked you both to get in the car. When I walked outside a few minutes later, you were still standing outside the car arguing. After we got in the car, you were still arguing. As far as I can tell, you were arguing over how many attempts you both needed to tie a proper knot with a bow when changing a duvet cover (when your mom and I asked for your help earlier this week). If there can possibly be a sillier thing to argue about, I can’t imagine what it would be. And yet, even after I attempted to intervene, you argued for most of the car ride. Neither of you could help yourselves.

As far as I could tell, the crux of the argument was that Leland believed Everett needed far more attempts in order to successfully tie the bow, whereas Everett believed that you each needed the same number of attempts. I pointed out that it really doesn’t matter (which is especially true given that Everett just learned to tie a bow, and even Leland only learned a few months ago), and that what matters is that you are both trying your best. And yet, you took turns insisting that you were right and the other was wrong the whole way to camp.

What floored me about the interaction is how it reminds me of so much around me. I watch adults, especially spouses and parent/sibling combinations, argue similarly all the time. We find some trivial source of disagreement, and just can’t help ourselves but respond, and respond, and respond, until we turn a trivial disagreement into a much, much larger disagreement.

As far as I can tell, these arguments are rooted in insecurity. We don’t feel safe, and so we try to control those closest to us in an attempt to regain a sense of security. Of course, no one likes being controlled, so attempts to control others inevitably fail, increasing our sense of insecurity. Even when we ‘succeed’ in convincing others to do what we want, the comfort is pyrrhic because our efforts to control those closest to us don’t really address the insecurity we feel.

To be clear, this is not a ‘they’ phenomenon; this is a ‘we’ phenomenon. I find myself regularly wanting to control your mom, my mom, my friends, my boss and coworkers (back when I worked), and in my lower moments, you two. And of course I experience all of those parties regularly wanting to control me.

I wish I could tell you that I’ve identified tools that allow me to deescalate these arguments as they occur. The best I’ve been able to do so far has been identifying the underlying fears and insecurities driving the argument (at least from my side) after-the-fact, and then working to let go of those insecurities so that they don’t trigger (or at least contribute to) unnecessary future arguments. In my best moments I even circle back with the counterparty to ‘clean up’ the argument and explain the insecurity that drove it, at least from my side. Someday in the future I hope to be able to identify my emotions in real time, so that I am more able to prevent unnecessary arguments and stick to what’s real (e.g. how I feel about the situation). At some point I even hope to be able to help those I love notice when they are triggered, so that we can move beyond the argument to the source of the insecurity driving the argument.

I still think your argument this morning was silly, preposterously so. And yet, I can’t begin to express how much adult human energy (including my own) I see wasted on equally silly arguments. I’m very much convinced that these silly arguments are manifestations of deeper hurt, and are actually meant to help distract us from identifying or feeling the hurt. The increasing frequency with which I see these arguments only reinforces my believe that we are hurting, afraid, and often responding with misguided righteousness. I’m also coming to believe that the way we address these arguments is, first and foremost, to focus on our own healing. Again, I’m learning that only by identifying and letting go of my own fear and sadness can I avoid repeating these silly arguments. As I write, it occurs to me that these arguments can be seen as gifts insofar as they help us identify areas of hurt wanting to be identified and addressed.

Regarding the two of you, I’ve noticed a few of this type of bitter, entrenched argument take hold recently. I’m not sure if this is normal for kids of your age, but I’ll admit I’m a little concerned that you are both holding onto some hurt that is manifesting in your relationship with each other. I’ll be spending some time with each of you attempting to identify the sources of your hurt so that you can try to heal while you are young. Barring that, it will be something to watch out for, especially in your interactions with each other, as you grow into adulthood.

I love you both.

Love,

Dad

Last days and goodbyes

June 9, 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

Today is Leland’s last day of 2nd grade. Today is also Leland’s last day of after school at the bilingual school where he also attended preschool, and where Everett attends preschool now. Today is also Everett’s last day of preschool. Next year Everett will attend kindergarten at Leland’s elementary school. Said differently: today represents a lot of transitions for our family.

In particular, today is the last day that either of you will attend school at a place where both of you have gone since our family moved home from Singapore. For the last 4.5 years, your mom and I have dropped you off and picked you up at the same place. We have enjoyed the teachers and the curriculum; both of you learned rapidly, and the school facilitated you learning at your own pace. You both made friends (in fact, Leland’s best friends are still the ones he made in preschool and kindergarten), and we have made friends with the parents of your friends. The school is bilingual, so your Chinese has improved immensely, which enables beautiful communication opportunities with your Ah Ma, as well as some of your mom’s friends. Even during Covid, the school and the families who attended were so careful that the school was able to remain open, without anyone getting sick until well after vaccines were readily available (I find this borderline miraculous).

I write today just to record that I’m feeling sadness today, and I think it’s because we are saying goodbye to a school that has been a staple in our lives for several years. In many ways it’s a small change: you’ll still go to school, you’ll still learn Mandarin (your mom insists on that), and you will maintain the friendships you made. But it’s still a change, and I’m learning there’s no value in denying the affect and the sadness I feel. I think the sadness stems in part from a broader concern I have: the two of you are growing up so fast, and I’ll admit that I worry the time is getting away from me. I really enjoy spending time with both of you, but I also notice that you are getting old enough that I’m not “enough” to keep you stimulated. You are growing up, and need more stimulus, more adventure, and more people and relationships in your life than I can provide on my own. And so I think I’m grieving not just the last day of school, but also the two of you growing up and, I sense, eventually growing apart from me.

I love you both more than I will ever be able to express. I’m so proud of you both for becoming the beautiful, strong, kind, smart, capable boys that you are. I hold incalculable gratitude that I have the both of you in my life. And, truth be told, today I am also sad to say goodbye to your school, but also to say goodbye to the era where you were little boys. And so, I will try to grieve today, and for as long as I need to, so that I’m ready to embrace the next chapter in our lives together.

I love you,

Dad

Updates on the health front (and related learnings)

June 6, 2023

Dear Leland and Everett,

I met with a cardiologist yesterday. I…didn’t enjoy the experience. I came to the meeting admittedly scared, but prepared with lots of questions; more than anything, I came wanting to establish a relationship with a doctor that can serve as a foundation stone in my healing process. This particular doctor didn’t seem to notice, or if he noticed be available for, my interests. To be fair to him, I think there were things going wrong for him that didn’t include me: he arrived ~30 minutes late to our appointment, and the nurse who checked me in apparently didn’t properly enter my measurements (weight, blood pressure, etc) into his system. So he was texting someone, and seemed mildly irked (he seemed to be taking it mostly in stride, but also didn’t seem able to let it go and move on, as he continued texting for a few minutes during our appointment). I asked him lots of questions, about nutrition, supplements, medications, and even alternative treatments like acupuncture. He asked once or twice where I had heard about these, rejected all of them, and at times even seemed annoyed that I was asking; as I think about it, he looked away from me and at his computer when answering multiple of them; these were the times I thought he was annoyed. I zoomed out and asked him my ultimate question, which is whether I can live a long, healthy life. He responded that I needed to take medication, noted that other than the calcium score I don’t have a lot of risk factors, and stated that my situation is not reversible. I asked a few clarifying questions about reversibility; he implied that nothing about my situation is reversible, and suggested more than once that I should have started on statins back in 2016 when I first learned of my high calcium score…which, even though he said it in a non-accusatory way, felt like he was blaming me for my situation more than helping me explore comprehensive solutions.

We scheduled some follow up tests (which was expected based on my primary doctor’s advice). I left the appointment feeling pretty triggered (meaning in fight-or-flight mode, and struggling to calm down). I digested the meeting a little, and talked it through with your mom to help me process my thoughts. I decided it’s possible this doctor was having a bad day, and he deserved another chance. I decided to continue with the follow-up tests, which I need anyway and he could schedule them more quickly than I could on my own. But I also decided I am looking for a doctor with more curiosity, more openness to discuss treatment options with me, and frankly a better bedside matter. If that’s not this doctor, I resolved to go find another. Until very recently I would have treated this doctor’s advice as sacrosanct, and/or assumed all other cardiologists would give me the same advice. So the progress, at least from my side, is the willingness to go find what I want, even if that means saying no to ‘experts’ who aren’t aligned.

Separately, my mom (your Gran) recommended a book to me about…reversing heart disease. I’ll admit that my first reaction was skeptical. This book is almost 30 years old. Surely the science has changed or improved in that time. But Gran suggested that this doctor promises reversal of heart disease, and I haven’t come across much literature making such promises, so I thought it was at least worth a shot.

I’m frankly floored by what’s in the book. The author (doctor Dean Ornish) talks extensively about how our mind, body, emotions, and spirit are connected (which today is uncommon: our doctors-including the cardiologist I saw yesterday-tend to treat our bodies as if they are completely separated from our minds and our emotions). He says almost exactly what I said in my health scare letter: that our physical ailments are manifestations of our emotional and spiritual struggles. He recommends yoga, meditation, honest communication (particularly around negative emotions like sadness and fear), visualizations, and spirituality as part of a comprehensive lifestyle approach to reversing heart disease. Partly what stunned me was how much the book’s ideas overlap with what I am currently doing (or learning how to do and creating the habits around doing). The book pointed out that most patients, when guided through visualizations, come to a vision of a wall around their hearts (as a way of protecting them from getting hurt). Just two days prior to reading that text, I had come to just that visualization via my own meditations. And the book repeatedly promises, supported via scientific studies published in prominent journals, that the program can clear blockages and reverse heart disease. Consider: this book delivers an almost completely different message from my cardiologist. I don’t recall ever reading a book that seemed so tailored to me. I feel like that book was written just for me, and I’ve never had that experience before.

Except for the diet. The book recommends a low-fat, vegetarian diet. After my original calcium score in 2016, my doctor at the time put me on a ketogenic diet (high fat, low carb). I wouldn’t call my current diet keto, but it’s still reasonably high fat and low carb. So the book’s diet calls for a big change. After some reflection, I realized that I am emotionally attached to eating meat. I’ve always resisted diets that recommend low meat consumption, and never seriously considered vegetarian diets. The keto diet appealed to me precisely because it allowed for meat consumption without restriction. A vegetarian diet by comparison feels very restrictive to me.

I came to realize my resistance is precisely why I need to try this diet. I’m not entirely sure what I fear, but I clearly need to face a fear of going without meat. I’m hopeful that in a year (or a few) my heart disease will reverse sufficiently that I can add meat back into my diet. But for now, I feel called (especially by the resonance of the rest of the book) to give this approach a try.

I’m learning one additional benefit will be that the diet will force me to engage more honestly with the people I love. One persona I haven’t introduced yet (because he emerged later) is It’s Fine. It’s Fine is afraid to ask for what he wants, and is afraid of being judged for being fussy or difficult. It’s Fine constantly sacrifices what I want for what I perceive others want. It’s Fine has been one of the primary decision-makers in my life for 30 years, and is frankly partly why I have heart blockages in the first place. Thus, I need to practice asking for what I really want, and being who I really am. Eating a vegetarian diet will inconvenience lots of people around me. While I certainly don’t celebrate inconveniencing the people I love, I realize that I have not asked any of them to be inconvenienced enough on my behalf of late, so this diet serves as a good opportunity to practice.

Finally, I met with the minister of the church I’ve been attending. He offers what he calls ‘spiritual direction’. My impression after one session a couple weeks ago: it feels like a natural continuation of the work I was doing with my coach, but with a more explicitly spiritual focus. Much of the work overlaps: focusing on body awareness, acknowledging and accepting the struggles the world presents us, and going inward via meditation for the answers we need.

During the session I outlined a few things on my mind. I brought notes that seemed disparate in nature, but as I talked I recognized that I seemed to be struggling with something specific and related in all of the different topics. As best I can explain it, I was struggling with how to re-engage with the world. My sense is that I’ve learned how to go inward over these last few months for answers, and that I’m developing confidence in my ability to manage myself and my emotions. And I’m sensing that it’s time to engage with the world again, for myriad reasons (not least of which being that sitting at home all day gets lonely!). But engaging with others means engaging with their fear and sadness, and right now I feel a little fragile from processing my own fear and sadness. And people seem much more gripped in fear and sadness than at any time I can remember, so it can be hard to engage without feeling overwhelmed by others’…stuff.

The minister said three interesting things in our session. First, he opined that I had only experience a ‘teaspoon’ of God’s love, and that I hadn’t yet opened myself up to the ocean available to me. Second, he suggested that I had dug through my layers of fear, but sensed that I hadn’t yet dug down to identify whatever was beneath it. As soon as he said it, I said without thinking, “sadness”. I didn’t realize that I had sadness to process, but since then I have realized I do. The third came in response to my request for advice on what to do next; he suggested I look in the mirror and say “God loves you” until I believe it. Then he looked at me and said “God love you. What are you gonna do with that?” Sensing that the magnitude of the message hadn’t landed, he leaned in, “GOD LOVES you. What are you gonna do with that? How are you going to let that crack your heart open?”. That did it: I was overwhelmed. We prayed and he went on to another meeting. I walked to the sanctuary and cried. Huge, heaving sobs. I realized that as I grew out of boyhood and into adolescence, I internalized that love became conditional. I realized that, for the past 30 years, I have lived my life in an effort to earn love from others. In that moment, I came to realize that I am loved, by God, and God’s love is unconditional. And that God’s love allows me to Be me, and not worry so much about how others react. The magnitude of the gap between the love I’ve been willing and able to feel, and the love that’s been available to me, overwhelmed me.

I’ve continued to practice like the minister suggested, first looking myself in the mirror and repeating “God loves you”, and then laying down to meditate. I’ve processed a lot of sadness, but sense that I have a long way to go. In one of those sessions, I realized that I truly loved being Gran’s (my mom’s) little boy. I felt so safe, secure, and loved. Adolescence and adulthood by comparison felt cold, distant, and remote. I accepted that I needed to grieve that I wasn’t a little boy anymore, because grieving honors the love and joy of something lost. Then I realized that you two are precisely the age I so enjoyed being, and I was reminded of how precious this window is. I said to the two of you recently that I wish I could freeze time and enjoy you just the way you are, because you are growing up too fast. Of course I don’t mean it: I love watching you grow up, and I would never want to impede you on your path. But I did realize that I am soon going to need to grieve the two of you moving from boyhood into adolescence, the same way I just grieved my own transition. But first I hope to enjoy these moments as fully as I can.

Through this process I have noticed some changes. I carry less tension than I have in years. My relationship with your mom has improved, as if by letting go of some sadness, I’ve made space in my heart to send and receive love again. I’m feeling better, and seem to be losing weight.

Subconsciously, I used to think that my health, my day-to-day life, and my spiritual journey were all separate, parallel paths. What I am starting to realize is that they are all deeply connected. There is only one path, and that is to Be. In order to Be, I need to live my life, I need to feed my spirit, and I need to ensure my physical wellbeing. But these are merely different aspects of Being. I just need to Be.

No grand conclusion today. I’ve decided that I will give you updates on my personal journey, so that you can see how I dealt with struggle, and take what is useful for you. Not that I expect all future letters to detail my struggle, but I do intend to write about my journey as baldly as I can bring myself to do so.

I love you,

Dad